“These tests are an important part of Overwatch’s improvement process.said game director Aaron Keller.Looking forward to growing the game with the lessons learned from the beta (…)“In addition to the usual thanks, the game’s development team has recently gained notoriety by sharing their feelings about the tool.”Ensuring representation in Activision Blizzard King gamesWhen designing the new character. On the scale widely advertised by the publisher a few days ago, there is no doubt that the so-called innovation process will hurt him again.
Several developers on the team also stepped up to simulate this approach based on a very confusing selection algorithm”Limit unconscious bias”, Dixit. A certain number of diversity points are therefore assigned based on origin, age, skin colour and even sexual orientation, as evidenced by one of the pictures, apparently a middle-aged Egyptian like Anna automatically gives you 26 points, 4 points bonus for losing an eye in battle.
character artist In this series, Melissa Kelly sees “(His) own company does everything possible to annihilate all well-meaning developers“, while revealing that Team 4, which was in charge of development, did not use “This terrifying dystopian picture”, instead relying on another equally powerful tool to explain diversity: his eyes.
In the face of an outcry, the offensive blog post was subsequently extensively edited, with the editor expressing regret for any offense the original article may have caused. Some would argue that a company that has multiplied its missteps in recent years could have saved itself a new version of this type.