If PlayStation used to highlight Call of Duty’s performance in its store in the past (WWII, Black Ops 4 and Modern Warfare were all entitled to the same distinction in 2017, 2018 and 2019), this tweet has The very special taste comes when Sony and Microsoft parted ways over the Activision Blizzard acquisition by competition authorities. Subject to approval, this acquisition will make it possible for Microsoft to do what it wants”The best-selling franchises on PlayStation“, as shown on the back of the jacket.
If Phil Spencer assures that he doesn’t intend to pull the popular franchise from PlayStation players in the first place (Microsoft also argues that such a gesture will cost Activision significant financially), this subtle concern will only come to light Valid for a number of years, as evidenced by documents issued by the UK’s competition watchdog, the CMA.
Phil Spencer’s latest statement on the topic on the Wall Street Journal’s microphone is commendable in terms of ambiguity. “Our intention is to continue to distribute Call of Duty on PlayStation where it makes sense.“, the boss who launched the Microsoft game. Of course, Microsoft will be the only one who can determine when and why it no longer makes sense to release Call of Duty on rival consoles.
In the same interview, Phil Spencer also claimed that Microsoft’s real motivation was less to master the Call of Duty console ecosystem than to be able to take advantage of… Call of Duty Mobile. Again, Phil Spencer is reminded that the phone is seen as the new Eldorado to ensure Microsoft’s growth in video games. In addition to the revenue that King’s Candy Crush generates on a daily basis, Microsoft also intends to make it available on iOS and by offering its own licenses (recently announcing Age of Empires mobile) and those of Activision Blizzard, which has already started making big moves. Take your place on Android (Call of Duty: Warzone Mobile, Diablo Immortal, Warcraft Arclight Rumble).